Writing apparmor profiles

All users face the same set of rules when they are executing the same program but traditional user permissions still apply and might result in different behaviour! Program chunks are specific things that a specific program needs due to some facet of local security policy. If there is no profile defined then the access will be denied.

AppArmor security profiles for Docker

The first event detected is the execution of another program. Ubuntu and Canonical are registered trademarks of Canonical Ltd.

There is no mediation based of port number or protocol beyond tcp, udp, and raw.

Mastering Kubernetes by Gigi Sayfan

It enables the designated child processes to be run without any AppArmor protection. Use at your own risk. Variables cannot be set in profile scope; they can only be set before the profile. Except in the case of Ubuntu Trusty, where some interesting behaviors are enforced.

An exec mode can only be specified when an exec condition is present. For other solutions that do better in this area, I'd recommend checking out grsecurity or Will Drewry's SECCOMP filter sandboxingboth of which significantly reduce kernel attack surface. It will invite you to use the application in another window and when done to come back to aa-genprof to scan for AppArmor events in the system logs and convert those logs into access rules.

If there is an 'x' rule on the new link, it must match the original file exactly. An example of a capability is to change ownership of a file chown.

This means AppArmor only logs to dmesg activity outside the bounds of the profile. See the following wiki page for more information: A Small Example The last thing I wanted to discuss in this post is a small example that should summarize everything we have talked about so far.

This allows a program to execute another file if it is executable. The use of ' include' is modelled directly after cpp 1 ; its use will replace the ' include' statement with the specified file's contents.

In practice, the kernel queries AppArmor before each system call to know whether the process is authorized to do the given operation. Allow transition to other profiles if they exist.

Profile transition with inheritance fallback execute mode These modes attempt to perform a domain transition as specified by the matching permission shown below and if that transition fails to find the matching profile the domain transition proceeds using the 'ix' transition mode.

Allow transition to other profiles if they exist.Command-line Completion (Compose) Compose Compose File Reference Controlling startup order (Compose) Docker Stacks and Distributed Application Bundles (Compose) Environment file (Compose) Environment variables in Compose Extending Services in Compose Frequently Asked Questions (Compose) Getting Started (Compose) Install Compose Link Environment Variables (Compose).

AppArmor can work in effectively two modes – enforce and complain. Enforce is the default production status of AppArmor, while complain is useful for developing a rule set based on real operation patterns and for logging violations.

# stop apparmor $ /etc/init.d/apparmor stop # unload the profile $ apparmor_parser -R /path/to/profile # start apparmor $ /etc/init.d/apparmor start Resources for writing profiles The syntax for file globbing in AppArmor is a bit.

AppArmor security profiles for Docker

However, at the time of this writing, a bug in AppArmor actually prevents properly transitioning from the sanitized helper to other existing profiles via the Pix rules, instead always using inherited execution.

Ironically, once this bug is fixed, chaining multiple weaknesses to. Subsequently, a profile can be "enforced"; that is, attempts by the application to access resources not explicitly permitted by the profile are denied.

Properly configured, AppArmor ensures that each profiled application is allowed to. Writing profiles for AppArmor by hand is important. There are some tools that can help: aa-genprof and aa-logprof can generate a profile for you and help with fine tuning it by running your application with AppArmor in complain mode.

Implementing Mandatory Access Control with SELinux or AppArmor in Linux

The tools keep track of your application's activity and AppArmor.

Writing apparmor profiles
Rated 5/5 based on 6 review